SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 2196

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, DILIP GUPTA
Saraswati Vidya Mandir Thru Manager Baleshwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Puneet Kumar Verma.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.,K.K. Singh.

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Dilip Gupta, J.

The grievance of the petitioner is that certain village pond land on Gata No. 272/1 ad-measuring 0.026 hectare and Gata No.272 ad measuring 0.148 hectare situated in Village Aamghat, Pargana and Tehsil Ghazipur, district Ghazipur, is being encroached upon.

2. Having regard to the judgement of the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others, reported in AIR 2011 SC 1123 , an earlier public interest litigation was disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Prem Singh vs. The State of U.P. and others, reported in 2012 (11) ADJ 404 .

3. In consequence, we direct that the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the concerned respondent with a certified copy of this order so that an appropriate inquiry can be initiated and required action be taken in accordance with law to protect the public pond in accordance with law laid down by the Supreme Court. We expect that this exercise should be completed expeditiously.

4. Petition is accordingly disposed of.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top