VIPIN SINHA
Rajan Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha, J.
Heard Sri Saurabh Trivedi and Sri P.K. Rai, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anurag Sharma, learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.02.2014 and 28.03.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 18, Meerut in S.T. No. 975 of 2013 (State Vs. Rajan Shukla) C.C. No. 652 of 2012, under Section 306 I.P.C., P.S. Medical, District Meerut.
3. It has been contended by learned counsel for the applicant that on 09.12.2013, the informant-o.p. no. 2 had filed a list of documents (Annexure-1) and in the said list of documents item no. 3 is a hand written letter of the deceased Smt. Kiran Shukla. It has been contended that the said list has been filed as evidence of the prosecution.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that against the filing of the said list of documents, he had filed elaborate objections, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the affidavit. To the said objections filed by the applicant, a replication was also filed by O.P. No. 2.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant has strongly contended that th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.