SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 2333

VIPIN SINHA
Rajan Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Saurabh Trivedi, P.K. Rai.
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate, Anurag Sharma.

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Vipin Sinha, J.

Heard Sri Saurabh Trivedi and Sri P.K. Rai, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anurag Sharma, learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.02.2014 and 28.03.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 18, Meerut in S.T. No. 975 of 2013 (State Vs. Rajan Shukla) C.C. No. 652 of 2012, under Section 306 I.P.C., P.S. Medical, District Meerut.

3. It has been contended by learned counsel for the applicant that on 09.12.2013, the informant-o.p. no. 2 had filed a list of documents (Annexure-1) and in the said list of documents item no. 3 is a hand written letter of the deceased Smt. Kiran Shukla. It has been contended that the said list has been filed as evidence of the prosecution.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that against the filing of the said list of documents, he had filed elaborate objections, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the affidavit. To the said objections filed by the applicant, a replication was also filed by O.P. No. 2.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has strongly contended that th






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top