RAVINDRA SINGH, MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
Baby – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A.
2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners Smt. Beby, Vinod @ Vohra, Deepak, Sunil and Bhagwan Singh with a prayer to quash the FIR of case crime No. 452 of 2014 under sections 363, 366, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Hasayan, District Hathras.
3. From the perusal of the FIR it appears that on the basis of allegation made therein the prima facie cognizance offence is made out. There is no scope of interfering in the FIR. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the FIR is refused.
4. However, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the kidnapped girl shall be produced before the court concerned, it is directed that in case the alleged kidnapped girl Km.? Beby appears/produced before the court of learned C.J.M. Hathras within 20 days from today and moves an application for her medical examination, recording her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C, the learned Magistrate concerned shall fix a date for the same purpose, on that date the first informant & officer in charge of the police station concerned shall be summoned, she shall be produced before C.M.O. concerned by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.