SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 1761

RAVINDRA SINGH, MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
Baby – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Abhishek Mayank.
For the Respondents:Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A.

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners Smt. Beby, Vinod @ Vohra, Deepak, Sunil and Bhagwan Singh with a prayer to quash the FIR of case crime No. 452 of 2014 under sections 363, 366, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Hasayan, District Hathras.

3. From the perusal of the FIR it appears that on the basis of allegation made therein the prima facie cognizance offence is made out. There is no scope of interfering in the FIR. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the FIR is refused.

4. However, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the kidnapped girl shall be produced before the court concerned, it is directed that in case the alleged kidnapped girl Km.? Beby appears/produced before the court of learned C.J.M. Hathras within 20 days from today and moves an application for her medical examination, recording her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C, the learned Magistrate concerned shall fix a date for the same purpose, on that date the first informant & officer in charge of the police station concerned shall be summoned, she shall be produced before C.M.O. concerned by the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top