AJAI LAMBA, AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN
Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P Thru Principal Secy. , Home Lucknow – Respondent
1. Order dated 26.2.2015 reads as under: -
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the impugned FIR registered as Case Crime No.C-220 of 2014 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3 /4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Ram Sanehighat, District Barbanki and also for direction to the opposite parties not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the said impugned FIR.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the dispute between the parties is of matrimonial in nature. There is most likelihood that the dispute may be resolved between the petitioner No.1-Santosh Kumar and complainant-opposite party No.4 (Smt. Renu Devi) who are husband and wife, through mediation. Learned counsel for the petitioners, therefore, requests that matter be referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are directed to deposit Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) within a week from today. Out of the amount so deposited, Rs. 7,000/- (seven thousand) will be paid to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.