SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 2172

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Ran Vijai Singh, J.
Mohd. Iliyas Kureshi & Another - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. & 3 Others - Respondent
Writ - C No. 35652 of 2015
Decided On : 25-06-2015

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Santosh Kumar Singh.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

Compulsory registration of marriages and the presumption provided by registration unless rebutted by an order of the competent Court or cancellation of the marriage certificate.

Headnote:

Marriage Registration - Compulsory Registration - The court held that all marriages are required to be compulsorily registered, and the registration gives a presumption unless rebutted by an order of the competent Court or cancellation of the marriage certificate.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, who had solemnised their marriage, sought relief as their marriage was not registered and no first information report had been lodged against them.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners by the police authorities if no first information report has been lodged against them. The petitioners were also directed to get their marriage registered within a stipulated period, failing which the interim protection given by the court would stand vacated.

Issues: Marriage registration, coercive action by police authorities, and the need for first information report.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the legal provision that all marriages are required to be compulsorily registered, and the absence of a first information report against the petitioners.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the above observations, providing relief to the petitioners while emphasizing the compulsory registration of marriages.

JUDGMENT

Ran Vijai Singh, J.

Heard Sri S.K.Singh, counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel.

2. No notice is issued to private respondent in view of the order proposed to be passed today, however, liberty is reserved for private respondent to apply for variation or modification of this order if he feels so aggrieved.

3. Petitioners' case in the writ petition is that both the petitioners being major they have solemnised their marriage on 14.6.2015. Their marriage has not been registered.

4. The Apex Court in Seema (Smt.) vs. Ashwani Kumar reported in 2006(2) S.C.C. 578 has laid down that all marriages are required to be compulsorily registered. The registration of marriages gives a presumption unless it is rebutted by an order of the competent Court or the marriage certificate is cancelled. Petitioners' case further is that no first information report has been lodged against them.

5. In view of the facts of the present case, I am of the view that in the event no first information report has been lodged against the petitioners, no coercive action shall be taken against them by the police authorities. It is made clear that in the event any first information report is lodged, it will be open for the police authorities to proceed in accordance with law.

6. The petitioners are directed to get their marriage registered in accordance with law within a period of two months from date of receipt of a certified copy of the order of this Court. In case their marriage is not registered within the stipulated period the interim protection given this court shall stand automatically vacated.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top