SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 2192

HARSH KUMAR
Rupin @ Chhotu – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vivek Kumar Singh, Mayank Yadav.
For the Respondents:Govt.Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Harsh Kumar, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that only two cases have been shown in the gang chart against the applicant as Case Crime no. 26 of 2012 and 56 of 2012 in which he has been granted bail by the Juvenile Justice Board by order dated 08.05.2015, copies of bail order have been annexed as annexure-3 and 4 to the affidavit; that the co-accused Vikky @ Vikas, Pradeep, Vikki @ Chhota and Mohit Sharma have been granted bail by another Bench of this Court vide orders dated 14.12.2012, 04.12.2012, 09.01.2013 and 11.10.2012 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 33040 of 2012, 31655 of 2012, 749 of 2013 and 26598 of 2012, copy of which has been filed at Annexure-5 to the affidavit; that the applicant has no criminal history; that the applicant is in custody since 17.09.2012.

3. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer of bail.

Upon hearing the counsel and perusal of record as well as considering the complicity of offence and version and cross version as well totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without expressing any opinion on the merits of the cas






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top