Manoj Misra, J.

Counter affidavit filed today, is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

3. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in case crime No.998 of 2014, under Sections 394, 411 IPC, Police Station Sikandrabad, District Bulandshahr with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.

4. The submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the prosecution is based on recovery of looted vehicle from joint possession of four persons. It has been submitted that co-accused Mahendra and Jeetu have been granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 06.04.2015 and 12.06.2015 passed in Bail Nos.8967 of 2015 and 20932 of 2015 respectively. It has been submitted that the applicant is innocent with no previous criminal history and is in jail since 26.11.2014 and, in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

5. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant, but could not point out anything material to the contrary.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon merits of the case, I am of the opinion