SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 2438

PANKAJ NAQVI
Pratiksha @ Princy – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Santosh Kumar Nigam.
For the Respondents:Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Naqvi, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for directing the court below to decide the Case no. 328 of 2013, under Section 12 of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Police Station Gazipur, District Fatehpur, pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court no.12, Fatehpur.

3. The contention of the counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.

4. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top