Karuna Nand Bajpayee, J.: -

The present criminal revision has been filed assailing the validity of the order dated 16.1.2014 passed by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate/Civil Judge (Senior Division) Kushinagar at Padrauna in complaint case No. 509 of 2013, Mushtaq v. Mainuddin and others under sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471, IPC pertaining to P.S. Pateharwa, District Kushinagar whereby the application under sections 210 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of the revisionist has been disposed of in a way which is tantamount to rejection.

2. Heard Sri Mohd. Shoeb Khan, learned Counsel for the revisionist and also Sri Hari Pratap Gupta who had filed his power on behalf of respondent No. 2 today which is taken on record. The entire record has been perused including the impugned order.

3. The contention of the Counsel for the revisionist is that the revisionist is facing criminal proceedings in a complaint case as an accused but about the same subject-matter an FIR was also lodged against him along with another co-accused and the investigation in that police case is going on. In such circumstances according to the submission of the Counsel for the revisionist the proceedings of the complain