SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 2588

AMAR SARAN, ANIL KUMAR SHARMA
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant:Govt. Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anil Kumar Sharma, J.: -

The appellant - State of U. P. has challenged the acquittal of the sole respondent recorded by the Sessions Judge, Saharanpur vide judgment and order dated 3.10.2005 in S. T. No. 20 of 2005 u/s 302, 201 IPC P. S. Kotwali Dehat, Saharanpur.

2. We have heard the learned AGA and perused the original record of the case carefully.

3. Facts germane to the appeal are that on 3.10.2004 complainant Rishipal submitted a missing report of his brother Pala s/o Kalu Ram aged about 50 years since 26.9.2004. His nephew Johny met Pala in the bus who told him that he is going to the house of Rakesh situated at Dera Satpal Singh Raja Nagpal. His brother Pala has not returned since 26.9.2004 and during search he came to know that accused Rakesh has told some one that he along with Brahman Sukesh s/o Baru Lal had strangulated Pala to death. On 5.10.2004 the complainant lodged another report with the police on the basis whereof case was registered and investigation started. The same day, the investigating officer arrested accused Rakesh at about 2: 45 p.m. and after interrogation he got the cadaver of the deceased recovered from a pond of village Ismailpur. Recovery memo w












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top