SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 2665

ANIL KUMAR
Sagir Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Munni Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mohd. Arif Khan
For the Respondent: R.P.Singh,R.P. Singh

JUDGMENT

Anil Kumar,J.: -

Heard Shri Mohd. Arif Khan, learned Senior Advocate, Shri R. P. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record.

2. Facts in brief of the present case are that initially, plaintiffs/appellants filed a suit for permanent injunction on the ground that the property in dispute which consists of house situated at Vazirbag, Town-Bahraich is in their possession, purchased by their father by way of two sale deeds on 09.12.1959 and 24.09.1967. There are two doors in the east direction of the house and also Sahan as well as Nikas. After the way of Sahan, there is a public toilet which is used by the plaintiff's and their ancestors. However, respondents have no right or title in respect of the way in question shown in the map filed along with the plaint and tried to take possession of the way and want to make a construction therein, on 20.09.1992, and put the material/bricks over the land in dispute. So, the suit has been filed with the prayer that defendants may be restrained to do so, registered as Regular Suit No.1047 of 1992, dismissed by order dated 30.11.1994 passed by IVth Additional Munsif, Bahraich.

3. Aggrieved by the said facts, the plaintif
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top