SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 3023

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Savitri Devi – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- Satyendra Nath Tiwari
For the Respondent:- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar,R.S. Mishra

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J.

Heard Sri Satyendra Nath Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar, counsel for the respondents.

2. The writ petition has been filed against the order of the Settlement Officer, Consolidation dated 6.9.2010 by which the appeal filed against the order of Assistant Consolidation Officer dated 31.10.1983 has been set aside and the matter has been remanded to the Consolidation Officer to decide the dispute between the parties after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the order of the Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 30.8.2013 dismissing the revision of the petitioner against the aforesaid order.

3. Chak no.450 was carved out in the name of Ban Bihari son of Lakhan. The petitioner as well as respondent no.3 are the daughters of Ban Bihari. It is alleged that on the death of Ban Bihari the petitioner filed an application under Section 12 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953(hereinafter referred to as "the Act")( registered as Case no.820) and on the basis of a compromise the name of the petitioner was directed to be recorded over the land in dispute by order dated 31.10.1983. Against the order dated 31.10.1983 respon






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top