SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 3028

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Shiv Patta – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- Ravi Pratap
For the Respondent:- C.S.C.,R.P. Srivastav, Rajeev Mishra

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J.

Heard Sri Ravi Pratap, for the petitioner and Sri Rajeev Mishra, for the respondents.

2. The writ petition has been filed against the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation (respondent-2) dated 07.02.2013, passed in proceeding under Section 12 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

3. The dispute relates to Chak no. 67 (area 2-11-17 bigha) of village Belghat tappa Mor, pargana Basti Pashchim, district Basti, which was recorded in the name of Jag Mohan son of Algoo, during consolidation. Jag Mohan died on 10.07.1986. The petitioner filed an application (registered as Case No. 747) under Section 12 of the Act, for mutating her name, as an heir of Jag Mohan, being his sister as Jag Mohan died issue less. Promod Kumar filed another application (registered as Case No. 1220) under Section 12 of the Act, for mutating his name, as an heir of Jag Mohan. Pramod Kumar is now not contesting the matter. These cases were referred by Assistant Consolidation Officer, to Consolidation Officer for decision on merit.

4. In the meantime Babu Ram son of Kalpu Bhooj and Kanhi son of Balihari filed another application (registered















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top