Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. on the point of admission and perused the records.

2. The instant revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 19.5.2014 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Meerut in Criminal Misc. No. 165 of 2014 and the judgment and order dated 21.1.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 5, Meerut in Criminal Appeal No. 310 of 2013 arising out of judgment and order dated 11.10.2013 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Meerut in Case Crime No. 387 of 2013 under Sections 376/511, 452 I.P.C. and under Section 7/8 of P.O.C.S.O. Act, 2012, Police Station Lisari Gate, District Meerut whereby the learned Juvenile Justice Board refused to enlarge the revisionist on bail and the appeal filed by the revisionist against the order of Juvenile Justice Board was also dismissed by the order impugned.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionist has argued that both the impugned orders have been passed in an illegal and arbitrary manner without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without keeping in view the legal proposition. The revisionist was declared juvenile by learn