SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 2872

ANIL KUMAR
Barkai – Appellant
Versus
Mahmood Khan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : H.S.Sahai, U.S.Sahai
For the Respondent: B.K. Srivastava

JUDGMENT

Anil Kumar, J.: -

Heard Shri U. S. Sahai, learned counsel for the appellants and perused the record.

2. Facts in brief of the present case are that the plaintiffs-respondents filed a suit for demolition of structures and also for possession over the land in dispute recorded as abadi plot No.3545 in which there is a dilapidated house over the land on the ground that the same has been purchased from Baleshwar who is tenure-holder, by way of sale deed dated 14.10.1965.

3. In the plaint, the plaintiffs had pleaded that the house has fallen down and the defendants have dispossessed the plaintiffs and raised structures and hence the suit for demolition and possession. Accordingly, the suit was registered having Regular Suit No.462 of 1996. Thereafter, the trial court by judgment and order dated 24.04.1971 has decreed the suit for possession in respect of the land in dispute. In this regard, both the courts below have given a concurrent finding which is based on the material on record.

4. The suit was resisted by the defendants-appellants on the ground that the land is suit is Sahan land of the defendants-appellants having their Ghari, Charni, pegs and Khalian and other agricultura



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top