ANIL KUMAR
Barkai – Appellant
Versus
Mahmood Khan – Respondent
Anil Kumar, J.: -
Heard Shri U. S. Sahai, learned counsel for the appellants and perused the record.
2. Facts in brief of the present case are that the plaintiffs-respondents filed a suit for demolition of structures and also for possession over the land in dispute recorded as abadi plot No.3545 in which there is a dilapidated house over the land on the ground that the same has been purchased from Baleshwar who is tenure-holder, by way of sale deed dated 14.10.1965.
3. In the plaint, the plaintiffs had pleaded that the house has fallen down and the defendants have dispossessed the plaintiffs and raised structures and hence the suit for demolition and possession. Accordingly, the suit was registered having Regular Suit No.462 of 1996. Thereafter, the trial court by judgment and order dated 24.04.1971 has decreed the suit for possession in respect of the land in dispute. In this regard, both the courts below have given a concurrent finding which is based on the material on record.
4. The suit was resisted by the defendants-appellants on the ground that the land is suit is Sahan land of the defendants-appellants having their Ghari, Charni, pegs and Khalian and other agricultura
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.