SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 2931

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Shivkali Devi – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Lucknow Division, Lucknow – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- Vijay Kumar Pandey, Rajesh Kumar Singh
For the Respondent:- C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J.

1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, for the petitioners and Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. The writ petition has been filed against the orders of Assistant Commissioner Stamp dated 20.07.2011, imposing deficiency of stamp duty and penalty etc. on sale deed dated 28.06.2010 of the petitioners and Commissioner dated 26.07.2012, dismissing, appeal of the petitioners, against aforesaid order.

3. The petitioners purchased plot 1904 (area 1.0530 hectare) (out of its total area 1.0910 hectare) and 1/4th share in plot 1907 (area 0.3670 hectare) (out of total area 1.1450 hectare) situated in village Semar Patta, pargana Dalmau, district Raibareli, from its owner Deshraj through registered sale deed dated 28.06.2010. In the sale deed, it has been mentioned that both the plots were contiguous and boundary of the land sold was mentioned. According to the provisions of Section 27 of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Rule-6 of U.P. Stamp (Valuation of Property) Rules, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules), plot numbers, area, land revenue, nature of land and the fact that in the transferred land three mango trees












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top