ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Sheo Kumar Singh, Anant Kumar, JJ.
Rajeev Kumar Tiwari alias Babloo - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 5206 of 2007 and Criminal Appeal No. 4149 of 2007
Decided On : 23-05-2014
Criminal Appeal - Conviction under Section 302 read with section 34 IPC, Section 452 IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 302, Section 34, Section 452 IPC - The court analyzed the evidence presented by the prosecution and the defense, scrutinized the witness testimonies, and considered the forensic evidence. The court found the prosecution's evidence to be trustworthy and reliable, and concluded that the guilt of the accused persons was proven beyond a shadow of all reasonable doubt. The judgment of the trial court was well-founded and there was no reason to interfere in the appellate jurisdiction. The appeals were dismissed, and the appellants were ordered to surrender immediately.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a complaint submitted by Mata Prasad Dwivedi regarding the shooting of his sons and neighbor by the appellants. The incident occurred due to enmity, and the complainant requested legal action be taken. The investigation led to the filing of charges against the accused persons, and the trial court convicted them based on the prosecution's evidence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the prosecution's evidence to be trustworthy and reliable, and concluded that the guilt of the accused persons was proven beyond a shadow of all reasonable doubt. The judgment of the trial court was well-founded and there was no reason to interfere in the appellate jurisdiction.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the credibility of the witnesses, the forensic evidence, and the shortcomings in the investigation. The defense raised concerns about the presence of the witnesses at the scene, the identification of the accused persons, and the handling of evidence by the investigating officer.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the evidence of family members should be scrutinized cautiously, and the quality of evidence should be considered over the quantity of witnesses. It also highlighted that the presence of shortcomings in the investigation does not automatically discredit the prosecution's case if the witnesses' testimony is reliable and corroborated by medical evidence.
Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed, and the appellants were ordered to surrender immediately. Their bail bonds were cancelled, and they were to serve out the sentences imposed by the trial court.
Anant Kumar, J.
Both these appeals are connected with each other and arise out of the same judgment and order and as such, they are disposed of by a common judgment.
2. Criminal Appeal No. 4149 of 2007 under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by Satyabrat Rai whereas Criminal Appeal No. 5206 of 2007 has been filed by Rajeev Kumar Tiwari alias Babloo. These criminal appeals have been filed against the judgment and order dated 16.6.2007 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 10, Gorakhpur in Sessions Trial No. 142 of 1998, State vs. Satyabrat Rai and others by which the appellants have been convicted and sentenced under Section 302 read with section 34 IPC to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.25,000/- has been imposed. They have been further convicted and sentenced under Section 452 IPC to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and a fine of Rs.2000/- has been imposed. In default of payment of fine, further two years additional imprisonment has been imposed. However, the the accused persons have been acquitted under Section 506 IPC.
3. On 21.6.1997 at 22: 50 P.M., complainant Mata Prasad Dwivedi had submitted a written complaint at police station Cantt. District Gorakhpur to this effect that on 21.6.1997 the complainant and his sons Ashok Kumar Dwivedi, Dan Bahadur Dwivedi, Subhash Dwivedi and neighbour Ramagya Gupta son of Suresh Gupta were sitting in front of residential house of Power House Colony where there was light of electricity. At about 9: 45 P.M. a Maruti Gypsy of white colour came all of sudden and stopped there from which Anand Pandey, Shri Prakash Shukla, Satyabrat Rai son of late Dan Bahadur and Rajeev Kumar Tiwari alias Babloo came out having weapons in their hands. Seeing them, we ran away. The complainant's son Ashok Kumar Dwivedi rushed into the residential house. The accused persons chased him in the house and opened fire upon him. Other son Dan Bahadur ran behind them and he was also shot dead on the road who had died there. Entire incident was seen by all of us. All the accused persons giving threat of life and making fires ran away in the Gypsy. It is further stated in the complaint that the complainant has taken his injured son Ashok Kumar Dwivedi to District Hospital Gorakhpur where he died. This incident was occurred due to enmity. The request was made that his report be lodged and legal action be taken.
4. On the basis of the complaint, a chik F.I.R. was prepared at Crime No. 1311 of 1997, under Sections 302, 506, 452 IPC. The investigation was handed over to Surybali Singh, Investigating Officer who visited the place of occurrence and prepared the site plan. From the spot, live and used cartridges were recovered. The Investigating Officer collected the bloodstained and plain soil from both the places i.e. the place where the deceased Ashok Kumar Dwivedi was shot fire inside the house and the place where the dead body of Dan Bahadur Dwivedi, other son of the complainant was found live and used cartridges were collected. Inquest report of both the deceased persons was prepared and the dead bodies of both the deceased persons were sent for postmortem. The post-mortem examination of both the dead bodies of Ashok Kumar Dwivedi and Dan Bahadur Dwivedi was done by Dr. O.N. Gupta on 22.6.1997.
5. The doctor found the following ante-mortem injuries on the dead body of the deceased Ashok Kumar Dwivedi: -
(1) Fire arm wound of entrance 1 cm x 1 cm x chest cavity deep on the left side chest 6 cm below left nipple at 6 O' clock position, margins inverted. Blackening and charring around the wound, margins present directed.
(2) Fire arm wound of entrance 1/2 cm x 1/2 on the right side lower jaw back, margins inverted, blackening and charring around the wound margins present.
(3) Fire arm wound of exit ¾ cm x ¾ cm on the middle of left side neck margins averted, corresponding with injury no. 2.
(4) Fire arm wound of entrance 1/2 cm x 1/2 cm on the back
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.