SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 2963

VIJAY LAKSHMI
Amit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionist :- Tara Chandra Bhardwaj,Raj Singh
For the Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Ajit Kumar

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi,J.

The instant criminal revision is preferred against the judgement and order dated 21.10.2011 passed by Sessions Judge, Aligarh in Criminal Appeal No.102 of 2011 (Amit vs. State of U.P.) whereby the order dated 9.6.2011 passed by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Aligarh in Misc. Case No.37 of 2011 under sections 376, 302 IPC, rejecting the application of revisionist to declare him juvenile was confirmed by learned Sessions Judge.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA and perused the record.

3. Some background facts in brief are that on 12.7.2010, an FIR was lodged by the complainant (opposite party no. 2 in the instant revision) under sections 302 and 376 IPC for rape and murder of his minor daughter alleging that on 11.7.2010 at about 5: 00 p.m. his daughter Km. Anita, aged about 16 years, had gone to collect woods in the jungle. When she did not return till night, the complainant searched for her and found her semi naked dead body with her 'Salwar' tied around her neck. The case was registered and investigated. The revisionist was found involved in the occurrence who took the plea of being a juvenile and moved an





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top