SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 2981

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Addl. District Judge Court No. 2, Faizabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rajendra Pratap Singh.
For the Respondent: Manish Kumar.

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J. –

Heard Sri Rajendra Pratap Singh, the petitioners.

2. The writ petition has been filed for quashing the orders of Judge, S: Cause Court (respondent-2) dated .1.2.2013, rejecting the application (12-Ka) the petitioners for substituting the heirs of Smt. Kaushilya (opposite party) lithe application for setting aside ex parte decree and the application (67-C) for permitting to amend/add the heirs of Smt. Kaushilya in the aforesaid application and order of Additional District Judge dated 30.4.2014, dismissing the revision of the petitioners, filed from the aforesaid order.

3. Smt. Nanhka Devi widow of Daya Ram filed as suit (registered as SCC Suit No. 38 of 1983) for arrears of rent and ejectment of Ram Narain (now represented by the petitioners) from house No. 47/1, situated at Bharat Kund,; Nandi Gram, pargana Haveli Awadh, district Faizabad on 27.8.1983. In the plaint, the plaintiff stated that she was landlord of the house in dispute and the defendant was a tenant on monthly rent of Rs. 30/. The defendant was not paying rent since 1.1.1978. The plaintiff, therefore, through notice dated 12.2.1983 terminated the tenancy of the defendant. In spite of









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top