SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 3059

RANJANA PANDYA
Shiv Dulari – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Om Narayan Dwivedi
For the Respondents:Govt. Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ranjana Pandya, J.: -

1. This revision has been preferred to quash the impugned order dated 20.04.2014 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banda in case No. 431 of 2014. Brief facts are that the complainant Shiv Dulari had moved an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. stating that on 16.03.2014 at about 09: 30 p.m. when she was at her house, her neighbour Raj Kumar, Kallu and one unknown person came and asked about the whereabouts of her husband. She stated that her husband has gone to Attara. At this all the three persons entered to her house and made her naked and tried to gang rape her. On hue and cry being raised by the complainant, her children come from the adjoining room then the accused ran away abusing all the people and threatening to kill them. The complainant went to the police station to lodge a report but her report was not lodged. The senior officers were also informed but no action was taken. Hence, this application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. was presented which was dismissed vide order dated 20.04.2014.

2. Learned lower court opined that there was no reason to get the case registered and investigated.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionist has argued





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top