SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 3132

MOHD.TAHIR
Sunita Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kripal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :- Vivek Kuamr Singh,Mayank Yadav

JUDGMENT

Mohd. Tahir,J.

This transfer application has been moved by applicant Smt. Sunita Devi with the prayer that Original Suit No.1074 of 2004 (Ram Kripal versus Smt. Sunita Devi) may be transferred from the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Meerut to any other court in the same judgeship.

2. The factual matrix of the case, in nutshell, is this that the applicant is the defendant of the aforesaid suit no.1074 of 2004; that the suit was filed by the plaintiff/opposite party no.1 Ram Kripal for specific performance of contract; that when the suit came at the stage of arguments the defendantpplicant on 20.5.2014 filed transfer application before the District Judge mainly on the ground that the Presiding Officer concerned is in collusion with the plaintiff and she will not get justice from his court and that the said transfer application was rejected by the District Judge vide his order dated 10.7.2014 on the ground that the allegations levelled against the Presiding Officer concerned are false, baseless and concocted.

3. The defendantpplicant has moved this transfer application before the High Court on the self same ground. The Stamp Reporter marked his report on the transfer app

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top