SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 3266

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B. Ram
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J.

1. Heard Sri B. Ram Counsel for the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed for quashing the order of Tehsildar dated 29.9.2006 allowing the mutation application filed by Ranveer Singh and others on the basis of sale-deed dated 20.2.2006 executed by the petitioner, order dated 31.8.2009 dismissing the recall application of the petitioner against the aforesaid order, the order of Sub-Divisional Officer dated 25.1.2011 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner and the order of Additional Commissioner dated 5.8.2014 dismissing the revision of the petitioner filed against the aforesaid order.

2. It is alleged that the land in dispute was allotted to the petitioner on 18.12.1995. Although the petitioner was granted bhumidhari with transferable right over the land in dispute on 1.5.2006 but the alleged sale-deed dated 20.2.2006 was procured by the contesting respondents in the garb of loan documents from the petitioner. The petitioner was bhumidhar with nontransferable right on the date of execution of sale-deed as such the sale-deed is void and no mutation can be made on its basis. However without making due proclamation and without giving notice to t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top