Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondents.

2. F.A.F.O. No. 1260 of 2011 has been filed by the car owner/appellant (Ramhet) assailing the award dated 10.02.2011 passed in M.A.C.T. Case No.138 of 2009 by Additional District Judge/Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court No.5, Faizabad.

3. Vide order dated 13.1.2012 passed in F.A.F.O., a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court provided that the entire awarded amount will be deposited by the appellant in the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which upon being received shall be invested by way of fixed deposit in a Nationalized Bank but before the aforesaid orders being implemented, the Insurance Company has deposited the entire amount so awarded. Therefore, the appellant has preferred the aforesaid review petition, bearing No. 308 of 2013.

4. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw review petition No. 308 of 2013.

Accordingly, review petition No. 308 of 2013 is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. On 9.5.2009, at about 10.00 A.M., when Santosh Kumar Mishra, who was working as Supervisor in Steel Product Ltd., Faizabad, was on the way to Babhnan via Parsh