SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 3143

ANIL KUMAR
Sheetla Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Vth Additional District Judge Sultanpur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: B.R.Singh
For the Respondent: C.S.C.,M.E.Khan

JUDGMENT

Anil Kumar,J.: -

Heard Sri B.R. Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, learned State counsel as well as Sri M.E. Khan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent perused the record.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.05.2007 (Annexure No. 1) passed by Vth Additional District Judge, Sultanpur in a pending appeal by which the petitioner's application under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C. has been rejected.

3. Facts of the case in brief are that on 01.12.1989 one Sri Ram Raj (now deceased) executed a sale deed in favour of the petitioner's father Sri Dhanraj in a mutation case under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, thereafter land which is subject matter of the sale deed mutated in the name of Sri Dhanraj.

4. In the year 1987, Ramsukh, Paramsukh, Sunil Kumar, Manoj Kumar, Pawan Kumar Shiv Kumar and Jairaji have filed a suit for cancellation of the said sale deed, registered as Civil Suit No. 37 of 1987 in the Court of Munsif, Sultanpur.

5. In the said suit, in order to establish their case on behalf of plaintiffs, Smt. Jairaji (wife of Sri Dhanraj) was examined as P.W. 1.

6. On the basis of pleading, other material on re





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top