SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 3363

ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA
Harbhajan Singh – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.C. Kapil, K.R. Sirohi and Y.K. Singh
For the Respondents: S.C. and Subodh Kumar

JUDGMENT

Anjani Kumar Mishra, J.

1. Heard Sri Yogeshwar Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 8026 of 1990. He also appears for the respondents in the connected Writ Petition Nos. 21538 of 1993 and 53995 of 2004, Sri Subodh Kumar, who appears for the contesting respondents in Writ Petition No. 8026 of 1990 and is Counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 33859 of 2001. Writ Petition No. 8026 of 1990 is directed against the order dated 17.3.1990 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Rampur and arises out of proceedings for allotment of chaks. The petitioner is holder of chak No. 84, Jagir Singh, respondent No. 2 is holder of chak No. 23 and respondent No. 3 is holder of chak No. 79.

2. It has been submitted by learned Counsel for the petitioner that at the A.C.O. stage, he was proposed a single chak on plot Nos. 200/9 and 46. Aggrieved by such proposal, the petitioner filed an objection demanding a chak on plot Nos. 22 and 24, which was Gaon Sabha land, situated near the Abadi. The objection is stated to have been dismissed by the Consolidation Officer by his order dated 27.4.1989. However, copy of this order has not been filed along with



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top