SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 3386

SURENDRA VIKRAM SINGH RATHORE
Deena Nath Dubey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore, J.

1. Under challenge in the instant criminal appeal is the judgment and order dated 1.3.2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 4, Faizabad, in Sessions Trial No. 64 of 2009 arising out of Case Crime No. 1074 of 2008, Police Station Kotwali Bikapur, District Faizabad, whereby the appellant-Deena Nath Dubey was tried for the charges under sections 498-A and 304-B IPC but he was convicted for the offence under section 498-A IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and also with fine of Rs. 5,000/- and he was also convicted for the offence under section 304 part II IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and also with fine of Rs. 10,000/- with default stipulation of one year's additional rigorous imprisonment. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of the present appeal are that the complainant Surya Narayan Pandey lodged an F.I.R. at Police Station Bikapur on 8.11.2008 alleging therein that his daughter Poonam was married with Sadanand Dubey who is son of the present appellant. The marriage

































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top