RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Yogendra Kumar Saini – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Kumar Tayal – Respondent
Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J.
1. Heard Sri Nipun Singh, Counsel for the revisionist. This revision has been filed from the order of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Kairana, Muzaffarnagar, dated 23.5.2014 passed in Suit No. 416 of 2012, rejecting the application (27-C) of the revisionist for direction to the plaintiff to supply Court Fee in the suit on the valuation of Rs. 20 lac.
2. Mahesh Kumar Tayal filed a suit (registered as Suit No. 416 of 2012) for declaring the sale-deed dated 7.9.2012, allegedly executed by him in favour of the defendant as null and void and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from making any alteration and demolition in the property in dispute. The plaint case was that the suit property was ancestral property of the plaintiff and fell in his share in private partition between his brothers. After partition, the plaintiff constructed three shop and stair case at ground floor and residential accommodation at first floor and is residing in it. In one shop at first floor the plaintiff is doing business and one shop was let out to one Intzar son of Natthu. Third shop was let out to the defendant Yogendra Kumar Tyagi and his brother Sushil Kumar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.