SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 2550

RAMESH SINHA
Maha Ahmad Yusuf – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh, Abhishek Tiwari and Girish Kumar Sharma
For the Respondents: A.G.A.

JUDGMENT

Ramesh Sinha, J.

1. Sri Girish Kumar Sharma, Advocate has filed his power on behalf of applicant, he states that he has taken no objection from Sri Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh, who is also present along with him, which is taken on record. Heard Sri Girish Kumar Sharma and Sri Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the applicant, Sri Nitin Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the impugned order dated 18.12.2014 passed by Incharge Chief Judicial Magistrate, Maharajganj in Case Crime No. 895/2014, under section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and 14-B Foreigner Act, P.S. Sonauli district Maharajganj and direct the C.J.M., Maharajganj to reduce the amount of personal bond and amount of sureties and also direct the C.J.M. Maharajganj to accept the aforesaid reduced amount in cash at the time of accepting the bail bond of the applicant in case crime No. 895/2014, under section 419,420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and 14-B, Foreigner Act, P.S. Sonauli district Maharajganj.

3. The contention of learned Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant earlier approached this Court and filed Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top