SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 2853

PANKAJ NAQVI
Umesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anurag Srivastava.
For the Respondents:Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Naqvi, J.

Power of Ms. Shivangi Bhargava on behalf of the informant is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Complaint Case No.1149/9 of 2014, under Sections 420/504/506 IPC, P.S. Amroha Nagar, Amroha, pendign in the court of Addl. Civil Judge -II (JD)/Judicial Magistrate, J.P. Nagar, Amroha.

4. It is submitted that daughter of applicant no.1 and sister of applicant nos. 2 & 3 is married to the son of O.P. No.2, but on account of marital discord between the couple, the wife lodged an FIR on 11.6.2014 as Case Crime No.283/2014, under Sections 323/324/504/506 IPC against her husband and his relatives in which a charge-sheet was submitted on 1.11.2014, but in retaliation thereto, the O.P. No.2 filed the above complaint on 16.6.2014 on false and baseless allegations only with a view to harass the applicants, which being an abuse of the process of the Court is liable to be quashed.

5. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case, at this stage, it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submiss





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top