ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Harsh Kumar, J.
Mohd. Ismail - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 36477 of 2015
Decided On : 12-10-2015
Bail - Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 411, 414 - The court refers to Sections 420, 411, and 414 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in granting bail to the applicant. These sections deal with offenses related to cheating and dishonestly receiving stolen property. The court considers the seriousness of the charges and the applicant's potential involvement in the alleged offenses.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant has been falsely implicated in a case involving the recovery of stolen motorcycles. The applicant claims to be the owner of a motorcycle mechanic shop and denies any involvement in motorcycle theft or forgery. The applicant alleges that he was threatened and falsely implicated due to a dispute over unpaid motorcycle repair dues. The recovery of the stolen motorcycles is alleged to be planted. The applicant has no previous criminal history and undertakes not to misuse the liberty of bail.
Finding of the Court:
After considering the arguments and the record, the court finds it a fit case for bail, without commenting on the merits of the case. The court takes into account the complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, and totality of facts and circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi: The court grants bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.854 of 2015, under Sections 420, 411, 414 I.P.C., P.S. Baghpat, District Baghpat, subject to certain conditions to ensure the applicant's compliance with the law and protection of prosecution evidence and the victim/complainant.
Result: The applicant, Mohd. Ismail, is released on bail.
Harsh Kumar, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated on the basis of recovery of four motorcycles from motorcycle mechanic shop J.K. Automobiles; that the applicant is carrying on motorcycle mechanic shop under the name and style of J.K. Automobiles since last 12 years; that the applicant has neither stolen any motorcycle nor received any stolen motorcycle; that since there were dues of motorcycle repair on police personnel and applicant made a demand for clearing some dues, he was threatened of dire consequences and has been falsely implicated; that none of the motorcycle is alleged to have been connected with any case of motorcycle theft; that recovery of stolen motorcycles has been falsely planted on applicant; that the applicant has not committed any forgery in changing the number plates of the motorcycles; that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the applicant; that there is no independent witness of the alleged recovery; that the applicant has no previous criminal history; that the applicant undertakes that he will not make misuse the liberty of bail; that the applicant is in custody since 7.9.2015.
3. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer of bail. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusal of record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
4. Let the applicant Mohd. Ismail be released on bail in Case Crime No.854 of 2015, under Sections 420, 411, 414 I.P.C., P.S. Baghpat, District Baghpat, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions: -
(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in nay manner whatsoever.
(ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.
(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.