SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 2952

OM PRAKASH VII
Priti Siddharth – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sunil Kumar Maurya.
For the Respondents: G.A.

JUDGMENT

Om Prakash-VII, J.

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to direct the court below i.e. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Jaunpur to decide the case no. 01 of 2015 under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, P.S. Line Bazar, District - Jaunpur expeditiously.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the concerned Court below is directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously preferably within the period prescribed under the Statute itself.

4. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top