SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 2159

OM PRAKASH VII
Sanjay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Zaid Arshad, Arshad Hamid.
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT

Om Prakash-VII,J.

On oral prayer, learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct the Section in the prayer clause as well as in the memo of application during the course of the day.

2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the order dated 22.2.2016 issuing non-bailable warrant in criminal appeal no. 57 of 2015 under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station, Banna Devi, District - Aligarh pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. VI, Aligarh.

3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

4. A perusal of the record reveals that on last several dates, the applicant filed adjournment application on various grounds. On 22.2.2016 also the applicant did not appear before the court and filed adjournment application through counsel, which was rejected by the court concerned observing that the adjournment applications were being filed with the intention to delay the matter and non-bailable warrant was issued against the applicant. Issuance of non-bailable warrant is within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

5. Having regard to the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top