Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J.

1. Heard Sri Rajesh Yadav for the petitioners and Sri S.C. Verma for the respondent.

2. The writ petition has been filed against the order of Board of Revenue, UP dated 9.6.2016 allowing the second appeal and setting aside the order of Additional Commissioner 4.2.2015 and reinstating the order of trial court passed in the suit under Section 229 B of UP Act No. 1 of 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

3. Ragghu, father of the petitioners-1 to 3 filed a suit for declaring him as bhumidhar with transferable right of the land in dispute. It has been stated by Ragghu that he was need of money of Rs. 900. Lalmani, respondent-3 (hereinafter referred to as the 'respondent') being his relation agreed to pay money in advance to Ragghu and for securing the money he wants some deed to be executed in terms of loan document. Ragghu went to Sub Registrar office where the respondent got the sale deed dated 21.5.1969 executed on payment of Rs. 900/- in his favour. When substantially the loan was re-payed then Ragghu asked the respondent to settle the account and take entire money of the loan, then respondent begun to avoid. Thereafter Ragghu made inquiry and