Amar Singh Chauhan, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned AGA. None appears on behalf of opposite party No. 2.

2. The revisionist Sunil Kumar Dwivedi, has preferred this criminal revision against the judgment and order dated 27.11.2014 passed by the Principal Judge Family Court, Kanpur Nagar in Case No. 27 of 2013 (Arpana Dwivedi v. Sunil Kumar Dwivedi), under section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Barra, District Kanpur Nagar, whereby the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was allowed and maintenance amount to the tune of Rs. 15,000/- per month was awarded to the opposite party No. 2 (Wife) from the date of application i.e. 09.01.2013.

3. Brief facts which give rise to the present revision are that an application under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Code of 1973’) was moved by Aparna Dwivedi on behalf of her claiming maintenance on the ground that the marriage of the revisionist was solemnized with her as per Hindu rites and rituals on 05.06.2010. The father of the opposite party No. 2 after taking loan from his friends and relatives solemnized the marriage of his lovely daughter with the revis