SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 3429

ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA
Shri Sharif Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Faiz Mohammad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Siddharth
For the Respondent: Shashank Shekhar Mishra

JUDGMENT

Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J.

1. Plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for mandatory injunction claiming relief of possession on the ground that the possession of the suit property was given to the defendant in the year 1983, pursuant to an agreement to sell but no sale-deed ultimately was executed. Infact, a suit for specific performance was filed but the same was dismissed with the finding that the suit itself was barred by time. A belated appeal is stated to have been filed but the delay in filing of the appeal has not even been condoned. Plaintiff contents that the possession which has been given to the defendant could not be continued any further once the transaction of sale could not materialise and, therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to return of possession. It was stated that defendants were at best a licencee and such licencee stood revoked. Suit was contested by the defendant-appellant on the ground that the proceedings before the civil court was not maintainable as the property sought to be sold was an agricultural land and the suit for eviction could be filed under Section 209 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act and the civil court has no jurisdiction














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top