SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 3445

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Saleem – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation, – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Arun K. Singh-I
For the Respondent: C.S.C.,Mahesh Narain Singh

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J.

Heard Sri Arun Kumar Singh-I for the petitioners.

2. The writ petition has been filed against the orders of Consolidation Officer dated 19.6.2014, Settlement Officer Consolidation dated 3.11.2014 and Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 25.6.2015 passed in the title proceeding under Section 9 A of UP C. H. Act.

3. The petitioners filed an objection under Section 9 A (2) of the Act on 21.12.1987 for recording their names over plot no. 628 (area 1-11-0 bigha) of village Dadri, pargana Dadri, Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar as their bhumidhari holding. It has been stated by the petitioners that the land in dispute was obtained by father of the petitioners from the then Zamindar for establishing a brick kiln over it before the abolition of zamindari. Since then the brick kiln was established and was continuously running by father of the petitioners and thereafter the petitioners are in possession over it. Before date of vesting the father of the petitioners has regularly paid rent to the Zamindar. After date of vesting names of the petitioners have been recorded in Coloumn- 4 of the khatauni. Although the petitioners have acquired sirdari right over it, ea






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top