SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 3656

SUNITA AGARWAL
Nabban Husain – Appellant
Versus
Rent Control & Eviction Officer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vishnu Kr. Singh,A.K. Rai
For the Respondent: C.S.C.,Uma Shankar Mishra

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By means of the present writ petition,petitioner is challenging the order dated 29.5.2015 passed by the Rent Control Eviction Officer/Additional City Magistrate(III), Kanpur Nagar wherein application dated 9.4.2015 filed under section 66(3) of Muslim Waqf Act, 1960(hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') and application dated 23.5.2015 filed under sections 65 and 66 of the Act have been rejected . By means of these applications, petitioner has sought impleadment of the Waqf Board as a party to the proceedings under section 16 of U.P. Act No. 13 for allotment of the premises in question. The pleading of the petitioner, who claims to be occupant of the building in question, is that the property in question is a Waqf property and is exempted under section 2(1) (bbb) of U.P. Act No. 13.

3. So far as the application in question is concerned, the petitioner had pleaded that the Waqf Board be impleaded and notice be issued and be called for to produce the waqf deed before the court below for establishing that the property in question is a Waqf property. The court below rejected the application on the ground that there





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top