SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 3708

ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA
Anokhi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Babu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- Archit Mehrotra
For the Respondent:- Rupendra K. Mishra

JUDGMENT

Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that as the entire facts of the case have already come on record, he does not intend to file any counter affidavit, as such, the petition is being disposed of without calling counter affidavit, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for permanent injunction before the Civil Judge ( Sr. Div.), Moradabad, which was registered as Original Suit No. 547 of 2014 on 1.7.2014, valuing the? suit at Rs. 5 lakhs, alongwith an application to grant temporary injunction. Upon application for grant of? temporary injunction, notices alone were issued and no ex-party injunction was granted. The first suit remained pending,? where after a second suit was, filed before the Court of Judge Small Causes, showing the valuation of? suit property? as Rs. 25,000/-, for same relief on 9.7.2014 and in the subsequent suit, an ex-parte interim? injunction was granted? on the date of its filing i.e. 9.7.2014. On the very next day, an application was filed in the first suit, seeking its withdrawal. Th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top