SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 3729

SUNEET KUMAR
Panaru Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ganpati Jha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- P.K. Kesari,Aditya Kesari
For the Respondent:- P.K. Ganguly

JUDGMENT

Suneet Kumar, J.

In brief, the facts of the case is that the respondent/landlord filed a suit being Suit No. 14 of 2011 before Small Cause Court at Varanasi for arrears of rent and eviction from the shop in question. The tenancy was determined by notice dated 1 May 2008 which was served upon the petitioner on 6 May 2008. The petitioner/tenant contested the suit by filing written statement on 16 January 2012. On 5 September 2012, the petitioner moved an application (44-Ga) stating therein that the petitioner was depositing the rent under Section 30 of Act No.13 of 1972 and had deposited the rent till August 2012, therefore, request to adjust the sum and permit the petitioner to deposit the rent in the pending suit for the month of September 2012 and onwards. The respondent/landlord contested the application by moving an application (48-Ga) requesting to strike off the defence of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner had not deposited the rent in terms of Rule 5 Order 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to which the petitioner filed a reply. The Court allowed the application (48-Ga) of the respondent/landlord striking off the defence of the petitioner vide order dat




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top