SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 3208

MANOJ MISRA
Indra Mani – Appellant
Versus
Upper Commissioner Azamgarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- Bhagwan Singh
For the Respondent:- C.S.C., Anuj Kumar

JUDGMENT

Manoj Misra, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. Brief facts of the case as they appear on record are that seeking cancellation of an allotment dated 22nd February, 1984, the petitioners, on 11th January, 1990, filed an application under Section 198(4) of the Act, on which the Additional Collector issued notice to the parties on 5th January, 1993. Later, the application was dismissed on 15th February, 2001. Though the order dated 15th February, 2001 is not on record, but from the order dated 9th November, 2001 (Annexure-'5' to the writ petition), it appears that application under Section 198(4) of the Act was dismissed as being barred by limitation. Thereafter, the petitioners filed an application seeking recall of order dated 15th February, 2001, which was rejected on 9th November, 2001 by the Additional Collector, Mau. Against rejection of the recall application, the petitioners preferred a revision before the Court of Additional Commissioner (Administration), Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh, which was dismissed vide order dated 17th May, 2003. It is against the orders dated 17th May, 2003 and 9th November, 2001 th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top