SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 3771

KRISHNA MURARI, AMAR SINGH CHAUHAN
Mohammad Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A.K. Singh,Pavan Kishore
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Krishna Murari and Amar Singh Chauhan, JJ.

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ, order or direction to declare the ceiling proceedings initiated against him and the order passed therein to have abated in accordance with the provisions of Repealing Act, 1999. Further prayer has been made to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to correct the entries in the revenue record.

2. The aforesaid relief is being claimed in the back-drop of the following facts.

3. Petitioner submitted his statement under Section 6 (1) of the Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976 (herein after referred to as the 'Act 1976') in respect of his holdings. Case no. 439/51/82, State of U. P. Vs. Mohammad Ali was registered and it is alleged that by means of an exparte order dated 27.10.1983 under Section 8 (4) of the Act 1976, certain area of land of his holdings was declared surplus. Subsequently, proceedings under Section 10 (1) of the Act, 1976 were drawn and notice under Section 10 (3) was issued and finally notice under Section 10 (5) was issued.

4. It is further alleged that no further proceedings were taken and no effort was made to take possession of the land and t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top