SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 3850

ABHINAVA UPADHYA
Vijay Bahadur Singh – Appellant
Versus
Munne Khan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- Deepak Kumar Srivastava

JUDGMENT

Abhinava Upadhya,J.

By means of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order passed under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC read with Rule 3 CPC for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit. The court below, while rejecting the application vide order dated 22.4.2014, has held that the petitioner for the same property against the same defendant had earlier instituted two suits, one was withdrawn with liberty to file another and the second suit was also dismissed for non prosecution. Now for the 3rd time in respect of the same property and between the same party, this suit has been filed. Now an application has been moved to withdraw the suit without indicating as to what is the legal error in filing the suit and what injury would occur to the plaintiff to pursue the suit with error, if any.

2. In the absence of such material, the court below was justified in rejecting the application for withdrawing the suit with liberty to file a fresh and has also imposed a cost of Rs. 2000/-.

3. It is noteworthy that for deciding the present suit the petitioner had filed a writ petition in which a direction was issued to decide the suit within the time frame. However, the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top