SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 3076

AMAR SINGH CHAUHAN
Amit – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionist :- Rajesh Pathak, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Amar Singh Chauhan, J. –

This revision has been preferred for release of the revisionist, who is juvenile against the judgement and order dated 19.11.2014 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Ghaziabad as well as order dated 25.3.2015 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act) in Criminal Appeal No. 19 of 2015, under sections 364, 302, 201 IPC, PS Muradnagar, district Moradabad whereby the prayer for bail has been rejected by both the courts.

2. Admittedly, the revisionist is a juvenile aged twelve and half years and special provisions are there for the bail of a juvenile.

3. The brief facts of the case are that on 26.8.2014 a written report was lodged by the informant Faiyyaz at police station Murad Nagar, district Ghaziabad to the effect that on 25.8.2014 his son, Adil, aged about 18 years, had gone to play from village with Amit, Abdulla, Amir Khan and Jikriya. During play, there was some altercations between Adil on one side and Amit, Abdulla, Khan and Jikriya on the other. In the evening all the four accused persons took away Adil, the deceased towards crematorium. When the accused were taking away the deceased, they were seen and stopped by Irshad and Alladin, but they did






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top