SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 3214

SUNEET KUMAR
Rajiv Kumar Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :- Ankit Kumar Rai, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties :- G.A.

JUDGMENT

Suneet Kumar, J. –

The applicant-complainant has approached this Court assailing the order dated 10.3.2016, passed by the revisional court/Additional Sessions Judge, Court no.6, Ghazipur in Criminal Revision No. 185 of 2014, whereby the summoning order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Ghazipur in Case No. 175 of 2011 (Rajiv Kumar Rai v. Yashwant Singh) summoning the accused/opposite party no.2 in proceeding under Section 138 of N.I. Act has been set aside and the matter remanded.

2. The facts briefly is that the opposite party no.2 is having brick-kiln, the complainant supplied charcoal to the opposite party no.2, for payment of the sum due cheques were issued, upon presentation to the Bank, the cheques were returned by the bank making an endorsement that signature do not match. After lapse of statutory period of notice, the opposite party no.2 did not pay the sum, consequently, the present complaint was filed. The learned Magistrate upon recording statement of applicant under Section 200 Cr.P.C and statement of his witnesses under Section 202 summoned the opposite party no.2, aggrieved, the summoning order was assailed in revision by the opposite party no.2, the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top