SUNEET KUMAR
Rajiv Kumar Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Suneet Kumar, J. –
The applicant-complainant has approached this Court assailing the order dated 10.3.2016, passed by the revisional court/Additional Sessions Judge, Court no.6, Ghazipur in Criminal Revision No. 185 of 2014, whereby the summoning order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Ghazipur in Case No. 175 of 2011 (Rajiv Kumar Rai v. Yashwant Singh) summoning the accused/opposite party no.2 in proceeding under Section 138 of N.I. Act has been set aside and the matter remanded.
2. The facts briefly is that the opposite party no.2 is having brick-kiln, the complainant supplied charcoal to the opposite party no.2, for payment of the sum due cheques were issued, upon presentation to the Bank, the cheques were returned by the bank making an endorsement that signature do not match. After lapse of statutory period of notice, the opposite party no.2 did not pay the sum, consequently, the present complaint was filed. The learned Magistrate upon recording statement of applicant under Section 200 Cr.P.C and statement of his witnesses under Section 202 summoned the opposite party no.2, aggrieved, the summoning order was assailed in revision by the opposite party no.2, the
Goaplast (P) Ltd v. Chico Ursula D’sourza and another
Laxmi Dyechem v. State of Gujarat and others, 2012 (13) SCC 375 (Paras 4
M.M.T.C. Ltd. and another v. Medchi Chemicals and Pharma (P) Ltd and another
Modi Cements Ltd v. Kuchil Kumar Nandi
NEPC Micon Ltd. v. Magma Leasing Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.