DEVENDRA KUMAR ARORA
Prabhat Kumar – Appellant
Versus
U. P. State Ware Housing Corp. Thr Its M D Lko. – Respondent
Dr. Devendra Kumar Arora, J. –
Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rakesh Kr. Chaudhary, learned Counsel appearing for respondents-Corporation.
2. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has sought for quashing of the punishment order dated 19.10.2011 passed by the Managing Director, U.P.State Warehousing Corporation, Lucknow, as also the appellate order dated 19.10.2011.
3. According to the petitioner's Counsel, the petitioner while working on the post of Warehouse Superintendent attained the age of superannuation on 31.7.2010 and prior to his superannuation, a charge sheet dated 19.3.2008 was served upon the petitioner with respect to causing loss to the Corporation to which petitioner submitted his reply on 3.4.2008 indicating therein that the petitioner had worked as Go-down Superintendent at the relevant time but except the natural loss no loss had accrued in any manner to the Corporation. Thereafter the Inquiry Officer submitted its report on 24.4.2008 to the Competent Authority but no final order was passed and the matter remained pending. In the interregnum, the petitioner attained the age of superannuation on 31
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.