SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 3419

SUNITA AGARWAL
Meena – Appellant
Versus
Pramodani Awasthi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:- Ram Sumer Chaudhary, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J. –

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 30.3.2016 passed by the Judge Small Causes Court on an application under Order 15, Rule 5 C.P.C.

2. Admitted facts of the matter are that the opposite party, claiming to be the landlord of the suit property served a notice dated 6.2.2014 upon the petitioner for determination of tenancy. The notice was duly served upon the defendant/petitioner. The defendant replied to the notice on 14.2.2014. After service of notice, eviction suit was filed with the assertion therein that the tenant is in default of rent from the month of October 2013 and a notice dated 6.2.2014 for determination of tenancy was served upon him.

3. Despite service of notice, the tenant neither paid the rent due nor handed over the vacant possession of the suit property and, therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to damages for use of occupation of the building and, further, the defendant is liable to be evicted. In the said suit, written statement was filed by the defendant/petitioner on 30.7.2014.

4. It appears that an application under Order 15, Rule 5 C.P.C. was filed by the opposite party-landlord on 20.10.2015 with the categorical asse





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top