SATYENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, RITU RAJ AWASTHI
Parshuram Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Mahendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for Union of India and perused the records.
2. The writ petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 3.11.2013 and 17.12.2013, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Lucknow, by means of which the original application as well as the review application filed by the petitioner were rejected.
3. The petitioner was initially appointed as Contingency Paid (C.P.) Chowkidar on 24.01.1980 and subsequently the Sub Post Office, Janaura, District Faizabad was abolished on 23.09.1986 and the service of the petitioner was terminated without any notice. The petitioner preferred O.A.No. 40/1989 before the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal by means of the order date 4.11.1991 allowed the claim of petitioner. In pursuance of the aforesaid order the respondents reinstated the petitioner on 16.12.1991 on the vacant post of C.P. Chowkidar. The petitioner thereafter made an application for back wages and other consequential benefits and when nothing was heard from the side of the opposite parties, he again filed O.A. No.40/93 which was dismissed by means of the judgment and o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.