Vinod Kumar Misra, J. –

Revisionist, Smt. Vandana Gupta, has preferred this revision against the opposite parties, Mukesh Babu and Smt. Renu Gupta against the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2012 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 11, Aligarh in S.C.C. Suit No. 36 of 2009.

2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

3. Necessary facts of the present revision are as follows:

4. Small Causes Suit No. 36 of 2009 was filed by Sri Mukesh Babu and Smt. Renu Gupta plaintiffs against Smt. Vandana Gupta, defendant for ejectment and for recovery of arrears of rent and damages.

5. According to the plaintiffs, they have purchased two shops and house from earlier owner, Yogendra Kumar through sale deed dated 3.7.2009. The portion of the sale deed came in the share of Yogendra Kumar in family partition amongst the brothers of Yogendra Kumar. In the share of Yogendra Kumar there was one shop and one godown whose tenant was defendant, Vandana Gupta. Defendant was tenant in the shop at the rate of Rs. 700/per month and she was also tenant in the godown, which was situated behind the shop at the rate of Rs. 1500/. So, total rent was Rs.