PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Kamla Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the records.
2. The application under section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., moved by applicant regarding incident happened inside her house in her presence, was registered as complaint case by impugned order dated 17.5.2016 passed by 1st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banda. This order of registering the application as complaint is under challenge in present proceeding.
3. This contention of learned AGA appears not unacceptable that according to said application alleged overt acts were committed inside house, and not at any public place or in public view, but applicant had tried to implicate accused for offence under section 3(1) 10 SC/ST Act, which is not applicable in such matter.
4. If facts of application under section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. is taken to be true, in that case also everything relating to fact is within knowledge of applicant and every evidence relating to it is within her control. There is nothing new that can be exposed after investigation. The trial court has passed order of registering aforesaid application as complaint after considering several judgement of this Court and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.