SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 3614

V.K.SHUKLA, MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ram Sunder Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :- Pankaj Rai (Acsc)
For the Respondent:- J.P.N. Singh

JUDGMENT

1. The present Special Appeal has been filed against the judgement and order dated 16.3.2009 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.30952 of 2007 (Ram Sunder Ram vs. State of UP and ors) wherein he has proceeded to dispose of the writ petition, relying upon the judgement passed by Division Bench of this Court in case of Board of Revenue and ors vs. Prasidh Narain Upadhyay reported in 2006 (1) ESC 611 (All) (DB), and directed the respondent no.2 to consider the claim of the petitioner after taking into consideration the service rendered by the petitioner on the post of Temporary Collection Peon from 4.2.1981 to 1.1.1990 for the purpose of computing his pension.

2. Shri Pankaj Rai, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the appellants-respondents has contended that the petitioner-respondent had worked as Seasonal Collection Peon in Tehsil Bairya, District Ballia from 2.2.1976 to 30.9.1991 with some artificial breaks. Again he worked from 1.12.1981 to 1.1.1990 on Temporary Seasonal Collection Peon. He did not hold any regular post and worked on non-pensionable establishment on the availability of work and fund. The provisions of Government or

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top